In a 6–3 ruling, the justices say the president exceeded his authority by imposing trade tariffs without congressional approval The...
Read More
Wave of dismissals in the US following Charlie Kirk’s death
Social media posts and videos trigger action against thousands of employees
In the United States, the death of conservative activist Charlie Kirk, who was killed on the campus of Utah Valley University, sparked a chain reaction on social media. Thousands of users posted messages and videos celebrating the murder, fuelling controversy and online clashes.
The social media attention quickly turned into coordinated action: conservative profiles and citizens reported videos and users, publishing names and addresses and contacting employers. Republican Senator Laura Loomer and the website Expose Charlie’s Murderers, which collected about 30,000 reports, also took part in the initiative.
Ripple effects in the workplace
The consequences were immediate and far-reaching. Public figures such as writer Stephen King had to publicly apologise for incorrect messages attributed to Kirk, but thousands of ordinary people lost their jobs because of social media posts. Several companies made public the disciplinary measures they had taken, involving employees in both the private and public sectors.
Among the most notable cases, MSNBC fired analyst Matthew Dowd for citing Kirk’s rhetoric as a potential contributing factor to the murder. Clemson University, initially evasive, formalised the suspension of an employee after public pressure. In the NFL, the Carolina Panthers terminated their relationship with a communications staff member, while quarterback Joe Burrow fired a member of his foundation’s board.
In Ohio and California, on the other hand, dismissals and business closures were determined by the virality of the videos, with venues and companies forced to deal with media boomerangs that were difficult to contain.
The risk for public employees
Public workers and teachers are not spared either: although the 1987 Supreme Court ruling protects the freedom of expression of government employees, analysts cited by CNN point out that, in cases of intense social pressure, behaviour that hinders the proper performance of duties can justify dismissal. This phenomenon particularly affects those who work with minors and have posted messages or videos supporting political violence.
THE LATEST NEWS
What Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor’s Arrest Means for Sarah Ferguson and Her Daughters
20 Febbraio 2026
As scrutiny intensifies around Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor, questions grow about the future of Sarah Ferguson and Princesses Beatrice and Eugenie The...
Read More
Iran Protests: Radiographs Show Devastating Wounds
19 Febbraio 2026
The Guardian and Factnameh reveal medical imaging from Iranian hospitals, showing catastrophic injuries inflicted on protesters during January crackdowns, highlighting...
Read More
Middle East: Risk of Imminent US Strike on Iran
19 Febbraio 2026
In recent days, tensions between the United States and Iran have escalated, with the US increasing military presence and Iran...
Read More
Oil price above $71 amid tensions in the Middle East
19 Febbraio 2026
Oil price rises due to US-Iran tensions: Brent rises to $71.30 per barrel as markets fear a prolonged conflict and...
Read More
Trump long-term plan for Venezuela oil sector: strategy and risks
18 Febbraio 2026
Washington signals a multi-year strategy after Maduro’s removal while industry leaders and analysts warn about costs, risks and political uncertainty...
Read More
(Photo: © AndKronos)
Condividi su:
-
Salute14 ore agoAlzheimer, dalla WashU un test sangue predittivo
-
Primo Piano13 ore agoCrans-Montana, italiani feriti raccontano: porte sbarrate e fuga proprietaria
-
In Evidenza15 ore agoTrump: pubblicare i file su Ufo e vita aliena
-
Spettacolo14 ore agoAddio ad Angela Luce, icona di cinema, teatro e musica napoletana