The president escalates global trade duties a day after the U.S. Supreme Court struck down his previous tariff measures Trump...
Read More
Article 5 of NATO: armed response is not automatic in the event of an attack
Italian lawyer Marco Valerio Verni clarifies how NATO intervention in the event of an attack on a member country is neither immediate nor mandatory, but subject to specific assessments
NATO’s armed response in the event of an attack against one of its members is not automatic. Explaining this dynamic to Adnkronos is lawyer Marco Valerio Verni, legal expert and legal area contact person for ‘Difesa Online’, on the day that Nato Secretary General Mark Rutte warned Vladimir Putin of the possible devastating consequences of an attack against an Alliance country.
‘It tends to be taken for granted that an attack on a Nato member automatically leads to an armed response from all member countries, but this is not the case,’ Verni explains. In fact, Article 5 of the NATO treaty does not provide for an immediate and compulsory reaction.
The article states that an armed attack against a country in Europe or North America is considered an attack against all members of the Alliance. However, the response is subject to evaluation. Each state can decide what action to take, which may include, but is not obligatory, the use of armed force.
‘The use of force,’ Verni explains, ‘is not automatic nor the only possible measure. The decision depends on a series of actions that must also be agreed with the UN Security Council’.
One of the main concerns today, he continues, are cyber attacks, which can have devastating consequences like conventional attacks and may require a similar response, up to and including the possible use of force in specific circumstances.
THE LATEST NEWS
Trump weighs military strike on Iran as nuclear talks advance
21 Febbraio 2026
The White House remains silent while U.S. forces reposition in the Middle East and Tehran prepares a draft nuclear agreement...
Read More
Mystery surrounds the disappearance of Sarah Ferguson
21 Febbraio 2026
After Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor’s arrest in the Epstein case, questions mount over the former Duchess of York’s whereabouts and financial ties...
Read More
US Supreme Court blocks Trump tariffs under IEEPA
20 Febbraio 2026
In a 6–3 ruling, the justices say the president exceeded his authority by imposing trade tariffs without congressional approval The...
Read More
What Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor’s Arrest Means for Sarah Ferguson and Her Daughters
20 Febbraio 2026
As scrutiny intensifies around Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor, questions grow about the future of Sarah Ferguson and Princesses Beatrice and Eugenie The...
Read More
Iran Protests: Radiographs Show Devastating Wounds
19 Febbraio 2026
The Guardian and Factnameh reveal medical imaging from Iranian hospitals, showing catastrophic injuries inflicted on protesters during January crackdowns, highlighting...
Read More
(Photo: © AndKronos)
Condividi su:
-
International-News23 ore agoUS Supreme Court blocks Trump tariffs under IEEPA
-
International-News4 ore agoMystery surrounds the disappearance of Sarah Ferguson
-
News12 ore agoAddio al piccolo Domenico, è morto il bimbo trapiantato con un cuore danneggiato
-
In Evidenza6 ore agoSi valuta la rimozione di Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor dalla linea di successione