US president talks regime change approach framed around negotiation amid Cuba’s economic crisis and ongoing discussions led by Secretary of...
Read More
Trump and the plan for Gaza: dangerous and ambiguous turn of phrase
Trump declares that the Palestinians will have no right to return to the territories they now occupy… The US president seems to be eluding concrete answers on the Palestinian issue, fuelling scepticism and confusion with strongly and deliberately ambiguous phrases
Recent statements by US President Donald Trump continue to raise doubts about his plan for the situation of the Palestinians and the future of Gaza. Speaking during an interview on Fox News, Trump stated that the Palestinians would not have the right to return to Gaza under his plan, but added that they would receive ‘much better housing’.
A statement that sounds contradictory: while on the one hand the right of return is denied, on the other hand better living conditions are promised, without however clearly explaining how this plan would be realised or what the actual fate of the Palestinians currently living in Gaza would be, given that they would be denied the right to return. The vagueness of his words raises concerns and dismay about a possible lack of concrete commitment by the US administration to the Palestinians, making the proposal appear more like a mere political statement rather than a well-defined strategy.
Uncertainty has been fuelled by the very wording of Trump’s statements, which hinted at ‘building a permanent place for the Palestinians’ but without going into detail on how this process will be managed or how the geopolitical context will evolve. The sense that emerges is that Trump is trying to avoid clear commitments, leaving room for interpretations that could lower expectations of the plan, making it difficult to understand what the true scope of the proposal will be and with that the possibility of hiding the real plan behind this proposal at the moment.
This ambiguity fuels the suspicion that Trump is trying to maintain a vague profile, without addressing the real implications of his words. The lack of concrete details and the tendency not to clarify fundamental issues such as Palestinian rights risk leading to a new phase of confusion. A situation that could soon precipitate into a new phase of the conflict, even more bitter than the one that occurred until the ceasefire of January 2025.
THE LATEST NEWS
Trump launches massive campaign against Iran as diplomatic patience ends
28 Febbraio 2026
President orders a multi-day operation targeting Iran’s nuclear and missile capabilities after repeated refusals to negotiate President Donald Trump has...
Read More
Trump says Iran “never really wanted an agreement” after joint US-Israel attack
28 Febbraio 2026
Hours after the operation with Israel, the US president claimed Tehran repeatedly pulled back from deals and warned of long-term...
Read More
For Tehran, better war than a deal with the United States
28 Febbraio 2026
Israeli scholar Meir Litvak says Iran chose the risk of limited conflict over accepting US demands seen as a threat...
Read More
US and Israeli strike on Iran tests layered air defenses and interceptor stockpiles
28 Febbraio 2026
Long-range precision attacks, missile salvos and drone swarms expose the strengths — and limits — of the region’s offensive and...
Read More
US and Israeli Strikes Target Khamenei and Pezeshkian in Iran
28 Febbraio 2026
Senior Israeli officials say the Supreme Leader and the Iranian president were among the primary objectives of coordinated raids US...
Read More
(Photo: © AndKronos)
Condividi su:
-
Primo Piano22 ore agoIsraele attacca l’Iran: “Attacco preventivo”, colonne di fumo a Teheran
-
International-News22 ore agoUS-Israel joint attack on Iran targets strategic sites VIDEO
-
Primo Piano17 ore agoAttacco di Usa e Israele all’Iran: raid su Teheran e Golfo, risposta iraniana
-
Salute21 ore agoSalute: salire le scale negli over 60 migliora forza e camminata