Sinner, Itia acquits him: ‘He did not violate anti-doping regulations’
-
Attacco Usa in Nigeria contro l’Isis, Trump: “Risposta al massacro di cristiani” VIDEO
-
Frana a Cormons: disperso un giovane e un’anziana sotto le macerie VIDEO
-
Tifone Fung-Wong colpisce le Filippine: un milione di evacuati VIDEO LIVE
-
Cargo Ups precipita in Kentucky: sette morti e diversi feriti VIDEO
Karen Moorhousen weighs in on the controversy surrounding the doping case involving Jannik Sinner and explains the misunderstandings surrounding the provisional suspension, defending Itia’s actions
The case related to Jannik Sinner continues to be at the center of discussions in the tennis world. Despite the closure of the Clostebol file with a three-month disqualification for the world number one, the result of an agreement with Wada, the controversy shows no sign of abating. Among the most critical is Nick Kyrgios, who has spoken of a lack of transparency on the part of tennis authorities. Responding to these accusations was Itia Director General Karen Moorhousen, who wanted to shed light on the handling of the case.
In an interview with Afp, Moorhousen said, “Perhaps the misunderstandings were created by some communication problems about the Sinner case. There was a mistaken belief that we were announcing positive tests when, in fact, we were talking about provisional suspensions. In both the Sinner case and the case concerning Iga Swiatek, the rules were followed. They appealed the provisional suspension within the stipulated period of ten days, and having been successful, the suspensions were not made public.”
Moorhousen further explained that if Itia had behaved differently, it would have violated its own rules. “In the future, this rule will probably be changed,” she added, alluding to possible changes in the communication protocols regarding interim suspension cases.
The director also clarified why former members of Sinner’s staff, such as Giacomo Naldi and Umberto Ferrara, were not punished despite their involvement in the doping case. “The offenses we are talking about involve intent to dop. In Sinner’s case, according to the attorneys we consulted, there was no justification for prosecuting any member of his staff, as there was no violation of the anti-doping rules of tennis, which echo those of the World Anti-Doping Code.”
THE LATEST NEWS
(Photo: © AndKronos)
-
Primo Piano2 giorni agoAttacco a una residenza di Putin, Mosca accusa Kiev: Zelensky smentisce
-
News2 giorni agoGiovane donna trovata morta a Milano: corpo rinvenuto in un cortile
-
World2 giorni agoDeragliamento di un treno in Messico: almeno 13 morti e 98 feriti
-
World2 giorni agoBolzonaro operato per singhiozzo cronico: intervento riuscito al nervo frenico


